Legal Opinion
In re Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Products Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided October 4, 2016No. MDL No. 2738PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TRANSFER ORDER
Sarah S. Vance, Chair
Before the Panel:* Plaintiff in the Lu-mas action listed on Schedule A and pending in the Southern District of Illinois moves under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize pretrial proceedings in this litigation in the Southern District of Illinois. This litigation consists of eleven actions pending in ten districts, as listed on Schedule A. The Panel also has been notified of forty-three related actions pending in twenty-three districts.1
Plaintiffs in nine actions and potential tag-along actions support centralization in the Southern District of Illinois. Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re Plavix Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013
- In re Power Morcellator Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2015
3Cited by34 opinions
- In re Valsartan N-Nitrosodimethylamine (Ndma) Contamination Prods. Liab. Litig.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2019
- Michael Perrone v. Johnson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Allard v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Allard v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- Anderson v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.