Legal Opinion
Michael Perrone v. Johnson & Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 7, 2022No. 21-1885PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 21-1885 _____________ MICHAEL PERRONE; TOM TARANTINO; ROCHELLE ROSEN, as participants in and on behalf of the Johnson & Johnson Savings Plan, and on behalf of a class of all others who are similarly situated, Appellants v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON; PETER FASOLO; DOMINIC J. CARUSO; JOHN DOES 1-20 __________ On Appeal from the United States District Court For the District of New Jersey (D.C. Nos. 3-19-cv-00923 and 3-19-cv-01115) District Judge: Honorable Freda L. Wolfson _______________ Argued January 20, 2022 Before:…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Moench v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Hughes v. Northwestern Univ.Supreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Craig Geness v. Administrative Office of PennsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- George v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Rinehart ex rel. Buzzo v. Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- NICHOLAS J. KOROLY v. FEDERATED HERMES INC., the ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE and the INVESTMENT COMMITTEE of the FEDERATED HERMES INC. EMPLOYEES PROFIT SHARING/401(K) PLAN, and JANE and JOHN DOES 1-20District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- SUPER COOL PRODUCTS, INC. v. BOEHRINGER LABORATORIES, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- Trull v. McCreary Modern, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2025