Legal Opinion

In re Valsartan N-Nitrosodimethylamine (Ndma) Contamination Prods. Liab. Litig.

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided February 14, 2019No. MDL No. 2875PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SARAH S. VANCE, Chair

Before the Panel :* This litigation arises out of an investigation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration into impurities found in generic drug products containing valsartan, a medication indicated for the treatment of high blood pressure and other conditions. During the course of the FDA investigation, a number of voluntary recalls of generic valsartan medications were issued. Purchasers of recalled lots of generic valsartan subsequently filed actions alleging economic losses. The initial wave of consumer class actions was followed by actions alleging personal injuries…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Products Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2016
  2. In Re Yasmin & Yaz (Drospirenone) Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2009
  3. In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Balistreri v. Boehringer Ingelham Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
  2. Dilbeck v. Prinston Pharmaceutical IncDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
  3. Garza v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  4. Greene v. Safeway, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
  5. Hansen v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API