Legal Opinion

City Button Works v. Cohn

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 15, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeals from two judgments, one in favor of the plaintiffs and the other in favor of the defendants, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, seventh district, borough of Manhattan.

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

Each of these cases was tried upon April 3, 1906. Judgment, however, was not entered in .either case until April 21, 1906, being more than fourteen days provided for by section 230 of the Municipal Court Act. It is strenuously urged by counsel for the respondent that, as section 230 provides that the court may have fourteen days in which to render judgment from the time “the same is submitted to him for that purpose,” and there being nothing in the return to show that the cases were submitted to the court on April 3, 1906, the judgments should not be reversed on that ground. The return states…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. v. FitzpatrickNew York Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Hill v. HillAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906
  3. Tannenbaum v. NatchtigallAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
  4. Maggio v. Ocean View CemeteryAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Summit Silk Manufacturing Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909
  2. Hand v. GoldbergerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1946
  3. Mosehauer v. JenkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API