Legal Opinion

People ex rel. v. Fitzpatrick

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1901PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Application for peremptory writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

A judgment was recovered in the Municipal' Court, fifth district, April 29, 1901, in favor of Louis Shulman against Colman Schechter et al. for $228.15 damages and costs. The relator, the attorney for the plaintiff in that action, received-no fee, but was to have for his services 50 per cent, of the recovery, besides the taxable costs. On May 1, 1901, the plaintiff received $50 and executed a satisfaction piece of the judgment, which was filed with the clerk of the court, and the judgment was thereupon canceled of record. L. 1857, ch. 344, § 58; N. Y. Consol. Act, L. 1882, ch. 410, § 1408.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bebee v. President, Directors & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1806
  2. Jones v. ReidNew York Supreme Court · 1799
  3. Piper v. ElwoodNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  4. Carpenter v. WillettNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  5. Bloom v. HuyckNew York Supreme Court · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Duringshoff v. O. B. Coates & Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916
  2. Norton v. Southern Railway Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1930
  3. Lindenborn v. VogelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  4. Fluegelman v. ArmstrongAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908
  5. Carpenter v. PirnerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API