Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hill

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 15, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, tenth district, borough of Manhattan, setting aside a judgment rendered -upon the merits in favor of defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

This case was tried on November 2, 1905, and, as appears by an indorsement upon the summons, briefs were to be filed November 9, 1905. The respondent also concedes in his brief that the parties were given one week in which to file briéfs. Judgment was rendered upon November 20, 1905. As the time in which to render judgment began to run from the day for the submission of briefs, the judgment was rendered within the fourteen days prescribed by section 230 of the Municipal Court Act. A. M. Eisenberg Co. v. Janzlik, 92 N. Y. Supp. 247. The order vacating the judgment was, therefore, without…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. A. M. Eisenberg Co. v. JanzlikAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City Button Works v. CohnAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906
  2. Barnes v. Summit Silk Manufacturing Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909
  3. Hand v. GoldbergerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API