Legal Opinion
Warren v. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers, Union—Industry Pension Fund
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 29, 1989No. 2:88-cv-70760PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM, OPINION AND ORDER
GADOLA, District Judge.
I. Granting defendant, Refiners Transport and Terminal Corporation's motion for dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6).
II. Granting defendant, Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers, Union — Industry Pension Fund’s motion for dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6).
III. Denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56.
IV. Denying plaintiff’s motion to hold proceedings in abeyance.
On March 1, 1988, plaintiff, James Warren, filed a two-count complaint against defendant, Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers, Union — Industry Pension Fund…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Public Employees Retirement System of Ohio v. BettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Daniel v. Eaton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Joyce A. Gelardi v. Pertec Computer Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- June G. Moore v. Reynolds Metals Company Retirement Program for Salaried EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- John Loffredo v. Daimler AGCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Gabarczyk v. BD. OF ED. OF SCH. D. OF POUGHKEEPSIEDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Cosgrove v. Circle K Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 1995
- Cosgrove v. Circle K Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 1995
- Barbagallo v. General Motors Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.