Legal Opinion

Cosgrove v. Circle K Corp.

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided May 2, 1995No. CV 89-321 TUC JMRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ROLL, District Judge.

Pending before the Court are class plaintiffs’ and defendant Circle K Corp.’s (“Circle K”) cross-motions for summary judgment on the issue of whether Circle K was a fiduciary, as defined in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A), for the Fred Hervey Interests Employees’ Benefit Plan (“the Plan”) when it purchased certain real assets from the Plan. Also pending before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment as to whether Karl Eller was a Plan fiduciary for ERISA purposes.

Relevant Facts

The facts relating to this ease are…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Braswell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. The Sommers Drug Stores Co. Employee Profit Sharing Trust, Cross-Appellant v. Corrigan Enterprises, Inc. And Walter N. Corrigan, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  4. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. Harris Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Donovan v. BierwirthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Liss v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  2. In Re Dynegy, Inc. ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2004
  3. Keach v. U.S. Trust Co., N.A.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2002
  4. In Re Reliant Energy ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2004
  5. Keach v. US TRUST CO., NADistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API