Conte v. Hahnemann University Hospital
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Presently before the Court is appellee Hahnemann University Hospital’s (“Hahne-mann”) motion to quash the appeal filed by Tuae and Joseph Conte. After careful review, we grant Hahnemann’s motion and quash the appeal.
In this civil action, a jury verdict was returned in favor of defendant Hahnemann and against plaintiffs Tuae and Joseph Conte. On January 24, 1997, the Contes filed a motion for post-trial relief. The trial court did not act upon this motion, and on May 27,1997, Hahnemann filed a praecipe to enter judgment on the jury’s verdict pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 227.4(l)(b) and…
3Cited by18 opinions
- Pittsburgh Construction Co. v. GriffithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Armbruster v. HorowitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Jahanshahi v. Centura Development Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Freeman v. BonnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Gibbs v. HermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.