Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Bonner

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 25, 2000No. 1116 EDA 2000PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, President Judge Emeritus:

¶ 1 Appellant, William Freeman, appeals from the Trial Court Order of March 15, 2000 denying his “Post-Trial Motion to Remove Nonsuit Nunc Pro Tunc”. We affirm.

¶ 2 Appellant commenced a medical malpractice action against Appellee, William Bonner, M.D., on January 10, 1997. 1 Just prior to trial, the Trial Court granted Ap-pellee’s Motion in Limine limiting the testimony of Appellant’s sole expert witness, Scott Jaeger, M.D., to the information set forth in his report. Dr. Jaeger’s report did not contain any commentary or criticism regarding the care rendered…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bass v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Union Electric Corp. v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. West Penn Power Company v. GoddardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. In Re the Interest of C.K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Gibbs v. HermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Lenhart v. Cigna CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Fischer v. UPMC NorthwestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Vietri v. Delaware Valley High SchoolSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Rothstein v. Polysciences, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Raheem v. University of the ArtsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API