Legal Opinion
Rosty v. Skaj
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided February 24, 2012No. Nos. S-11-0063, S-11-0136PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURKE, Justice.
[¶ 1] In these consolidated appeals, Appellant, Vincent Rosty, challenges the district court's order entering default judgment and the district court's denial of his motion to set aside entry of default and default judgment. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
ISSUES
[¶ 2] Appellant presents the following issues:
1. Whether Appellant timely appealed the district court's ruling denying Appellant's motion to set aside entry of default and motion to set aside default judgment?
2. Whether the district court erred by permitting the hearing on default judgment to proceed when…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Jonathan Woodner Co. v. BreedenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Vanasse v. RamsayWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Theresa Hicklin v. Robert EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- Adel v. ParkhurstWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- Nowotny v. L & B Contract Industries, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Cornhusker Casualty Company v. SkajCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Lompe v. Sunridge Partners, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Steven F. LudlowWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Jontra Holdings Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company Brisbane Angels Nominees Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company and Associated Construction Equipment Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company v. Gas Sensing Technology Corporation, a Wyoming Corporation D/B/A WelldogWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
- Casey Charles Peak v. Amanda Ann PeakWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.