Legal Opinion

Baggett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 28, 1912No. 1570PublishedCited by 17 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

This is a conviction for hog theft, the punishment being assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

1. The main State’s witness, O. D. Cowan, was a principal in the alleged theft. He, therefore, was an accomplice when used as a witness for the State, and a proper charge was required, instructing the jury in regard to this phase of the law. The court gave the following charge in that connection: “Now, you are instructed that you can not find the defendant guilty upon O. D. Cowan’s testimony unless you first believe that the testimony of the said O. D. Cowan…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Combs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. Pratt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
  3. Barrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Early v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Newman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Shipman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Chase v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Sealey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. State v. CocklinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API