Legal Opinion

City of San Antonio v. El Dorado Amusement Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided April 27, 2006No. 04-04-00638-CVPublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

SANDEE BRYAN MARION, Justice.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment in favor of appellee on appellee’s regulatory takings claims against appellant.

BACKGROUND

Appellee, El Dorado Amusement Company, was the owner of the land and a building located at 8235 Vicker Drive, which location has been operated, over the years, as a bar, pool hall, and club, always selling alcoholic beverages. The land owned by El Dorado comprises one city block. Vicker Drive comprises about two city blocks. In January 1999, the San Antonio City Council member for the property’s district…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. City of Beaumont v. BouillionTexas Supreme Court · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Ted Lazarides, in His Official Capacity v. Grady Farris, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
  2. City of Houston v. James & Elizabeth CarlsonTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Koch v. TEXAS GENERAL LAND OFFICE, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
  4. Lamar Corp. v. City of Longview, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
  5. Mbp Corp. v. Bd. Trustees Galveston Wharves, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API