Legal Opinion

CPS International, Inc. v. Harris & Westmoreland

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 23, 1990No. 9785PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRANT, Justice.

CPS International, Inc. and Creole Production Services appeal from the granting of a judgment non obstante veredicto for attorney’s fees to the law firm of Harris & Westmoreland. The firm sued CPS and Creole for attorney’s fees for services in a case styled CPS International, Inc. v. Dresser Industries, Inc.

CPS and Creole contend that the trial court erred in granting Harris & West-moreland’s motion for judgment n.o.v., in excluding evidence of Harris & Westmore-land’s failure to comply with discovery requests in the Dresser case, in restricting the scope of cross-examination,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Collora v. NavarroTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Lone Star Gas Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Jackson v. EwtonTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Gulf Paving Co. v. LofstedtTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Dodd v. Texas Farm Products Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Westech Engineering, Inc. v. Clearwater Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Chilton Insurance Co. v. Pate & Pate Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  3. Cullins v. Foster, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  4. Musgrave v. Brookhaven Lake Property Owners Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
  5. Cain v. Pruett, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API