Continental Can Co. v. Poultry Processing, Inc.
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
GENE CARTER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Continental Can Company, Inc., seeks in this action to recover sums due Plaintiff for the shipment of goods, specifically cans and can ends (cans), for which Plaintiff alleges Defendant, Poultry Processing, Inc., had assumed the duty to pay on behalf of nonparty Medomak Canning Company. Plaintiff is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Wayne, New Jersey. Defendant is a Maine corporation with its principal place of business in Portland, Maine. Jurisdiction is properly founded on diversity of citizenship under 28…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dehahn v. InnesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- Faw v. GreenwoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Zamore v. WhittenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Gentle v. Lamb-Weston, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1969
- Lorenz Supply Co. v. American Standard, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Paris Utility District v. A.C. Lawrence Leather Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1987
- Packgen v. Berry Plastics Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 2013
- Offroad Performance v. John WallsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002