Legal Opinion

Leggett v. Wardenburg

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1939No. Civil No. 4033PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is a petition by H. A. Wardenburg, hereinafter called petitioner, against Era B. Leggett, as administratrix with the will annexed of the estate of John E. Leggett, deceased, hereinafter called defendant, requesting the superior court of Pima county to fix an attorney’s fee in said estate under the provisions of section 4049, Revised Code 1928. The matter was heard before the court at great length, and the following judgment was rendered:

“It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that H. A. Wardenburg do have and recover of and from Era B. Leggett, administratrix with the will annexed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blackford v. NeavesArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Tevis v. RyanArizona Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Ollason v. GlasscockArizona Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Warren v. MosherArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Packard Phoenix Motor Co. v. McRuerArizona Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. Ahwatukee Custom Estates Management Ass'n v. BachArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Ex parte HaleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  4. Funk v. SpaldingArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Berg v. BergNebraska Supreme Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API