Legal Opinion
Ahwatukee Custom Estates Management Ass'n v. Bach
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided January 28, 1999No. CV-97-0495-PRPublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McGREGOR, Justice.
¶ 1 The primary issue before us is whether the successful party in a contract action may recover its non-taxable costs as part of an award of attorneys’ fees under Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 12-341.01.A (West 1992). We hold it may not.
I
¶2 This matter stems from a disagreement involving Appellant Daniel Bach’s (Bach) installation of a fence and pilasters on his property in the Ahwatukee Custom Estates-8 Subdivision. Appellee Ahwatukee Custom Estates Management Association (ACEMA) brought an action against Bach, asserting the height of his fence and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Schwartz v. SchwerinArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Carolyn Bradley and Michael Bradley, Infants, by Minerva Bradley, Their Mother and Next Friend v. The School Board of the City of Richmond, VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Harris v. Maricopa County Superior CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- GTE Wireless, Inc. v. Cellexis International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Keg Restaurants Arizona, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Key v. Chrysler Motors Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Schritter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2001
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.