Legal Opinion

Ollason v. Glasscock

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1924No. Civil No. 2029PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHELPS, Superior Judge

(After Stating the Facts as Above). — This action was instituted by Mrs. Burke, appellant’s grantor herein, to enjoin the sale of the property in question by the sheriff of Yuma county upon the order of sale hereinbefore mentioned, and to adjudge title to said property to be in appellant’s grantor, and that defendant Glasscock be decreed to have no interest therein by reason of his said writ of attachment or execution. The defense intérposed by defendants is to the effect that the transfer of the property in question from Mulford to Burke was made with the intent to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Simon v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Hart v. ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Blackford v. NeavesArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Harding v. . LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  5. Helms v. . GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. Schwartz v. SchwerinArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Moore v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  4. Premier Financial Services. v. CitibankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  5. Viscount Air Services, Inc. v. Cole (In Re Viscount Air Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API