United States v. Ronald Hamilton, AKA Seal O
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BETTY B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Ronald Hamilton, who conditionally pled guilty to a federal drug trafficking offense, appeals his conviction. He argues that the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained from a search of his car was in violation of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel, because at the suppression hearing the district court permitted the government to conduct redirect examination of the searching officer concerning Hamilton with neither Hamilton nor his counsel present. We agree and therefore reverse.
I. BACKGROUND
This case arises…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- United States v. Jose Luis Gonzalez-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Daniel Chavez v. David RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Kevin LaneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Steven YamashiroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.