Legal Opinion

United States v. Kevin Laney

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 5, 2018No. 15-10563, 15-10605PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAWKINS, Circuit Judge

In these consolidated appeals, we must determine whether a presumption of validity attaches to a stipulation 1 by defense counsel that their clients waive their right to a jury trial on their criminal charges. Defendants Kevin Laney and Brian Federico contend that: (1) the stipulations submitted by'their respective trial counsel did not effectively waive their Sixth Amendment rights and (2) their convictions on several counts of conspiracy and mail fraud are not supported by sufficient evidence. We ' conclude that counsel’s stipulations in this case did not raise…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith Wayne FREDERICK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Jose Luis Gonzalez-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Angelo StackhouseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  2. United States v. Edward KnightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  3. United States v. Luis CejaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  4. United States v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  5. Mihaljevich v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API