Legal Opinion
Kidder v. Mayor of Cambridge
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 8, 1939PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDolan, J.
These are two petitions in each of which a writ of mandamus is sought. The cases were heard together by a single justice of this court who, without decision, reported them upon the petitions, answers and statement of agreed facts for the determination of the full court. The cases therefore come before us on the report as cases stated. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 231, § 126.
In the first case, Clarence P. Kidder is the sole petitioner, and the respondents are the mayor of Cambridge, three duly appointed and qualified election commissioners of that city, and Benjamin F. Wyeth. The petitioner seeks the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Madden's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Brown v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
- Bradley v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Attorney General v. DrohanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Barnes v. Mayor of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Moore v. Election CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Corning Glass Works v. Ann & Hope, Inc. of DanversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- State Ex Rel. James v. SchorrSupreme Court of Delaware · 1948
- Nichols v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.