Legal Opinion
Rich v. Ball Ranch Partnership
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided January 29, 2015No. Court of Appeals No. 14CA2297PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JUDGE J. JONES
' {T1 Ball Ranch Partnership, Roland G. Ball, Leonard O. Ball, Tammie L. Ball, Wayne W. Ball, and Marietta B. West (collectively, petitioners) petition this court, pursu*981ant to section 18-4-102.1, C.R.S.2014, and C.A.R. 4.2 for interlocutory review of the district court's order denying their motion for a determination of a question of law. We dismiss the petition because the issue certified by the district court-the interpretation of a contractual provision-does not present a "question of law" within the meaning of section 18-4-102.1 and C.A.R. 4.2.
I. Background
1 2 From…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- James R. Ahrenholz, Plaintiff-Appellee/respondent v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, Defendant-Appellant/petitionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Harriscom Svenska Ab v. Harris CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Ad Two, Inc. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Catskill Development, L.L.C. v. Park Place Entertainment Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Feiger, Collison & Killmer v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cloudpath Networks, Inc. v. SecureW2 B.V.District Court, D. Colorado · 2016