Legal Opinion

Pfaffinger v. Seely

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, C. J.

The motions for a nonsuit and directed verdict may both be considered under the one head. Both motions were made on the claim that there is no evidence of defendant Irma Seely being connected with the injuries inflicted upon the plaintiff. Defendants claim that there is no evidence that defendant Irma Seely owned either the hops, the horses and wagon, or that she employed the person in charge of said team.

Plaintiff introduced as a part of his testimony the deed showing conveyance of the property on which the hops were harvested to the defendants jointly as husband and wife. Defendants were,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ganoe v. OhmartOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Schafer v. SchaferOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Meck v. CavanaughWashington Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re LubyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API