Legal Opinion

Meck v. Cavanaugh

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1928No. 20944. Department OnePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPabeer, J.

The plaintiff, Mrs. Meek, sought a decree establishing title to a tract of land situated in King county in the defendant Fred B. Cavanaugh, Sr., or in the community composed of him and his wife, the defendant Edith; the record title to the land being in the name of Fred B. Cavanaugh, Jr., to the end that the land be subjected to the lien of a money judgment rendered by the superior court for King county in favor of Mrs. Meek and against Cavanaugh, Sr., claimed by Mrs. Meek to evidence a community obligation of Cavanaugh, Sr., and his wife Edith. The relief sought by Mrs. Meek was rested upon…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brotton v. LangertWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Way v. Lyric Theater Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Oregon Improvement Co. v. SagmeisterWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Day v. HenryWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Milne v. KaneWashington Supreme Court · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Selaster v. SimmonsArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Van Geest v. StocksWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Pfaffinger v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API