Legal Opinion

Parmer v. Aiken

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1944No. Civ. No. 3166Published

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal on the ground that the question involved has become moot.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for breach of a' contract to sell real property. He obtained a writ of attachment against the property of defendants on the ground that they were nonresidents of this state.

Deféndants moved to quash the writ claiming to be residents of California. Their motion was heard on conflicting affidavits, submitted by both parties, and was denied. The appeal is from the order denying the motion.

In support of his motion to dismiss the appeal plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weaver v. ReddyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Nelson v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. California Prune & Apricot Growers' Ass'n v. Pomeroy Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API