Legal Opinion

State v. Warren

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 29, 1999No. 99-0129-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCane, C.J.

We must decide whether charging a defendant with multiple counts of perjury based on testimony given to a circuit judge in the same proceeding violates the rule against multiplicity. The State appeals an order granting Roger Warren's postconviction motion to vacate his perjury conviction on count two of a three-count information. The State argues that the trial court erred when it vacated Warren's peijury conviction and sentence on count two based on multiplicity and double jeopardy concerns because: (1) while counts two and three of the information are identical in law, they are different in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. RabeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. KuntzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. LechnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. EischWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. SaucedaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. KollerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  2. People v. ZadraColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State v. ServelloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  4. State v. MultalerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  5. State v. JacobsenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API