State v. Warren
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtCane, C.J.
We must decide whether charging a defendant with multiple counts of perjury based on testimony given to a circuit judge in the same proceeding violates the rule against multiplicity. The State appeals an order granting Roger Warren's postconviction motion to vacate his perjury conviction on count two of a three-count information. The State argues that the trial court erred when it vacated Warren's peijury conviction and sentence on count two based on multiplicity and double jeopardy concerns because: (1) while counts two and three of the information are identical in law, they are different in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. RabeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. KuntzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. LechnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. EischWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. SaucedaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. KollerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- People v. ZadraColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. ServelloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. MultalerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- State v. JacobsenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.