Legal Opinion
Sinan v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 4, 1930No. Docket No. 203PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSloane, P. J.
This is a case in which the decision on appeal rests chiefly on the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict of the jury, and in which, it is conceded by both plaintiff and defendant, there is no conflict in the evidence.
The verdict was for the defendant and the correctness of such verdict must rest upon the justification from the undisputed facts for the inferences and conclusions which must have been arrived at to support the' verdict.
As the testimony of the numerous witnesses, shown in the bill of exceptions, is in substantial accord, nothing is to be gained by reviewing such…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Douglas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Pierce v. United Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Starr v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Keena v. United RailRoads of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Rathbun v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Toole v. Richardson-Merrell Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Long v. BarbieriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Pope v. WenischCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Gotcher v. MetcalfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.