Klotsche v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOTLEY, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs Robert Klotsche and Robin Acosta have commenced this action challenging the legality of section 434a-8.0 of the New York City Administrative Code. Section 434a-8.0 establishes a maximum hiring age of twenty-nine years for New York City police officers. Plaintiffs contend that this policy violates the Equal Protection Clause of the federal Constitution because it is not rationally related to any legitimate state purpose. Plaintiffs also assert that the hiring age policy constitutes a violation of the New York Executive Law’s proscription against age…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Emil v. DeweyNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Giuntoli v. Garvin Guybutler Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Long v. AT & T Information Systems Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Kaczor v. City of BuffaloDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1987
- Feldman v. Nassau CountyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- New York City Managerial Employees Ass'n v. DinkinsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.