Legal Opinion

Martin v. Roth

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1997No. S-95-1180PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

The appellants, Marguerite “Peg” Martin (Martin) and her husband, Roy Martin, brought this consolidated personal injury and loss of consortium action against the appellee, Brad J. Roth, whose vehicle collided with the rear end of Martin’s vehicle after sliding on gravel. The district court for Douglas County denied the Martins’ motions for a directed verdict on the issue of liability and for a new trial. The Nebraska Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment in an unpublished memorandum opinion filed January 24, 1997. We granted the Martins’ petition for further review and now reverse,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Traphagan v. Mid-America Traffic MarkingNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Sedlak Aerial Spray, Ltd. v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Greyhound Corp. v. Lyman-Richey Sand & Gravel Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Hoover v. Burlington Northern RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Nickell v. RussellNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Doe v. ZedekNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. McLain v. OrtmeierNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Radecki v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Baker v. Fabian, Thielen & ThielenNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Steele v. Encore Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API