Legal Opinion

Champlin Refining Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 16, 1946No. 21PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson

The Interstate Commerce Commission, acting under § 19 (a) of the Interstate Commerce Act,1 ordered the appellant to furnish certain inventories, schedules, maps and charts of its pipe line property.2 Champlin’s objections that the Act does not authorize the order, or if it be construed to do so is unconstitutional, were overruled by the Commission and again by the District Court which dismissed the company’s suit for an injunction.3 These *32questions of law are brought here by appeal. Judicial Code § 238, 28 U. S. C. § 345.

Champlin owns and operates a line of six-inch pipe five hundred and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The Pipe Line CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Valvoline Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. East Ohio Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Central Maine Power Co. v. Maine Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. In the Matter of Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company, Debtor. Appeal of Sanborn Cooperative Grain Co., Sanborn, IowaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Mid-America Pipeline Co. v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API