United States v. Champlin Refining Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark
Section 1 of the Interstate Commerce Act provides that “common carriers” engaged in the “transportation” of oil or other commodities shall be subject to the regulatory requirements specified in other sections of the statute.1 In an earlier proceeding, this Court found that Champlin, as owner of a pipe line, was a “common carrier” within the meaning of § 1; and on the record there presented the Court upheld an I. C. C. order under § 19a (a)-(e) of the Act requiring the company to submit valuation data, maps, charts and other documents pertaining to its operations.2 Champlin Refining Co. v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- The Pipe Line CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Valvoline Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Champlin Refining Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Champlin Refining Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1950
3Cited by21 opinions
- Wallace v. JaffreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Salomon v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Grogan v. DeSapioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Mark M. Akins v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- In the Matter of Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company, Debtor. Appeal of Sanborn Cooperative Grain Co., Sanborn, IowaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.