Legal Opinion

Federal Trade Commission v. Consolidated Foods Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 28, 1965No. 422PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

The question presented involves an important construction and application of § 7 of the Clayton Act,1 38 Stat. 731, as amended, 15 U. S. C. § 18. Consolidated Foods Corp. — which owns food processing plants and a network of wholesale and retail food stores — acquired Gentry, Inc., in 1951. Gentry manufactures principally dehydrated onion and garlic. The Federal Trade Commission held that the acquisition violated § 7 because it gave respondent the advantage of a mixed threat and lure of reciprocal buying in its competition for business and “the power to foreclose competition from a substantial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. United States v. General Dynamics Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. Von's Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. Pabst Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Columbia Nitrogen Corporation v. Royster CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API