Federal Trade Commission v. Consolidated Foods Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
The question presented involves an important construction and application of § 7 of the Clayton Act,1 38 Stat. 731, as amended, 15 U. S. C. § 18. Consolidated Foods Corp. — which owns food processing plants and a network of wholesale and retail food stores — acquired Gentry, Inc., in 1951. Gentry manufactures principally dehydrated onion and garlic. The Federal Trade Commission held that the acquisition violated § 7 because it gave respondent the advantage of a mixed threat and lure of reciprocal buying in its competition for business and “the power to foreclose competition from a substantial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- United States v. General Dynamics Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Von's Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Pabst Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Columbia Nitrogen Corporation v. Royster CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.