Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 29, 1972No. 70-113PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

This is a direct appeal under § 2 of the Expediting Act, 32 Stat. 823, as amended, 15 U. S. C. § 29, from a judgment of the District Court (286 F. Supp. 407, 315 F. Supp. 372), holding that Ford Motor Co. (Ford) violated § 7 of the Celler-Kefauver Antimerger Act1 by acquiring certain assets from Electric Autolite Co. (Autolite). The assets included the Autolite trade name, Autolite’s only *565spark plug plant in this country (located at New Fostoria, Ohio), a battery plant, and extensive rights to its nationwide distribution organization for spark plugs and batteries. The present appeal2 is…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
  3. United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. Marine Bancorporation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation v. General Telephone & Electronics Corporation and Hawaiian Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API