Legal Opinion

Dakota County Abstract Co. v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 18, 1977No. 46673PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sheran, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by the former state human rights commissioner from a decision of the district court modifying an order of the Minnesota Human Rights Department. We reverse the district court, and remand with instructions that the department’s order be reinstated.

This appeal involves the setting aside of an allowance of back-pay to an individual found to have been discriminated against in her employment by reason of her sex.

Laurilee Martin was first employed by respondent Dakota County Abstract Company in January 1964. Her duties consisted primarily of indexing the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ekstedt v. Village of New HopeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. Minnesota Department of Highways v. Minnesota Department of Human RightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Continental Can Co. Ex Rel. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Lamb v. Village of BagleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Mower County Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API