Legal Opinion

Krukas v. Aarp

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 6, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2018-1124Published

1Opinion of the Court

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HELEN KRUKAS, ANDREA KUSHIM, and GEORGIA LUKE, on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated, Civil Action No. 18-1124 (BAH) Plaintiffs, Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell v. AARP, Inc., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This putative class action challenges the role of defendants AARP, Inc., AARP Services, Inc. (“ASI”), and AARP Insurance Plan (“AARP Trust”) (collectively referred to as “AARP”) in soliciting, marketing, and administering a supplemental Medicare health insurance program, known as a “Medigap” program. Plaintiffs,…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API