Legal Opinion
Ciampetti v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 31, 1989No. 440-87LPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
Pending is defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Defendant has moved that the complaint be dismissed on one or all of several grounds. For the reasons that follow, defendant’s motion is denied. On grounds independent of those urged in defendant’s motion, plaintiffs’ claim is dismissed in part.
I. BACKGROUND
The property which is the subject of this inverse condemnation action is located within the Diamond Beach section of the Township of Lower, County of Cape May, in New Jersey. Diamond Beach is a rectangular parcel of land running roughly north to south, with its…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Howard W. Heck, and Associates, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Ciampitti v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Florida Rock Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Good v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Walcek v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.