Legal Opinion

Swinford v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 10, 2004No. CA CR 03-4PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John F. Stroud, Jr.,

Chief Judge. Appellant, Jeffrey Swin-ford, was tried by a jury and found guilty of the offenses of aggravated assault, theft by receiving, and fleeing. On appeal, he raises two points: 1) that the trial court erred in refusing to allow cross-examination of two of the State’s witnesses to show possible bias, and 2) that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury regarding either the accomplice status or the accomplice-in-dispute status of the two witnesses. We agree with both of his points of appeal and therefore reverse and remand for a new trial.

On September…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vanoven v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  2. Teater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  3. Rogers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  4. Gilcrease v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  5. Gilcrease v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API