State v. Shirley
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
Defendant assigns error to the denial of his motion for a continuance. A motion for continuance is ordinarily addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge, whose ruling thereon is subject to review only for manifest abuse of discretion. State v. Moses, 272 N.C. 509, 158 S.E. 2d 617. In this case the motion was made on the day of trial upon the ground that a material witness was then unavailable. It appears that the witness was in custody of military authorities in Texas awaiting trial by court-martial on a charge of being absent without leave and, possibly, on a charge…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. MosesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. FlowersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. FoyeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. ConnardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. ElamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.