Legal Opinion

State v. Buckom

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 1991No. 335PA90PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

The central issues before this Court on appeal are whether the trial court erred (1) by denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss the charge against him for larceny from the person, or (2) by refusing to submit a possible verdict for the lesser offense of misdemeanor larceny for the jury’s consideration. We affirm the holding of the Court of Appeals that the trial court did not err.

Evidence for the State tended to show that the defendant entered the Convenience Mart owned by James P. George — through his corporation, George of John Street, Inc. —on 25 October 1988. Catherine…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McMichael v. ProctorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Steelman v. City of New BernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. InglandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Hall v. PostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. . HamptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ShambergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. State v. VanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Garland v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1994
  5. State v. PickardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API