Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Kay v. Steinmetz

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1959No. 11076PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Browning, Judge:

Petitioners, alleging themselves to be the duly appointed “Bridge Commission of the City of Dunbar, West Virginia,” filed their original petition in this Court on July 29, 1959, seeking a writ of mandamus requiring respondents to vacate and cease usurpation of the office of members of that Commission and to turn over all documents, papers, and other property in their possession belonging to the Commission.

The petition alleges the creation of the Bridge Com mission, as authorized by Michie’s 1955 Code §§ 1687 (2) [17-17-80], by Ordinance No. 126 of the City of Dunbar. Ordinance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Arant v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Hertzog v. FoxWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Alta Rhodes v. Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Cunningham v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. White v. ManchinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State Ex Rel. Waller Chemicals, Inc. v. McNuttWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State Ex Rel. Musick v. LondereeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State ex rel. Kingsbury v. CapertonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Colobro v. Mercer County Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API