Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Kingsbury v. Caperton

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1994No. 22089PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this original proceeding in mandamus, the relators are state employees who are affected by the employee classification and pay plan (plan) that was developed by the respondent, the Director of the Division of Personnel and his staff. The claim is made that the plan is being implemented contrary to the mandatory provisions of W.Va.Code, 29-6-10(2) (1992).1 Also included as respon*701dents in this proceeding are the members of the State Personnel Board (Board).

The particular provisions of W.Va.Code, 29-6-10(2), which the relators claim are being violated, are that the Board has not held a public…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White v. ManchinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State Ex Rel. Waller Chemicals, Inc. v. McNuttWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State Ex Rel. Musick v. LondereeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State Ex Rel. Kay v. SteinmetzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Colobro v. Mercer County Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API