City of Dallas v. Riddle
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WALTER, Justice.
On a favorable verdict, Horace R. Riddle and wife, Ernest C. Uselton and wife, Virgie E. Pressnell and wife and Sallie C. Sharp recovered a judgment against the City of Dallas in a condemnation case. The City has predicated its appeal on eighteen points of error.
Appellant’s numerous points complaining about jury argument cannot be sustained because the alleged improper argument was not preserved by a bill of exceptions. Pritchett v. Highway Insurance Underwriters, Tex., 309 S.W.2d 46. Appellant’s contention that it is entitled to a judgment based on the original answers made…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Younger Brothers, Inc. v. MyersTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Pritchett v. Highway Insurance UnderwritersTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. StarlingTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Horton v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Land Clearance for Redevelopment Corp. v. DoernhoeferSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Sarah Coventry, Inc. v. Blanch-Ette, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Brewer v. ScarboroughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Hurt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Hurt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.