Legal Opinion
In re Cohen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 8, 1924No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jaycox, J.:
From an order canceling and discharging a mechanic’s lien, the lienor appeals. The learned judge at Special Term wrote an opinion from which it appears that the basis of the motion and the decision was that the lienor had previously filed another lien which, prior to the filing of the second hen, had been discharged under section 59 of the Lien Law for lack of prosecution. (See 122 Misc. Rep. 451.)
The following facts are undisputed: A hen was filed; it was discharged as above stated and within the statutory period this new hen was filed, and these are all the facts necessary for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Berger Manufacturing Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Clarke v. HeylmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- In re BronitskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- In re CohenNew York Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by12 opinions
- Madison Lexington Venture v. Thomas Crimmins Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Mechanic's Lien Filed by Supreme Plumbing Co. v. Seadco Building Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Joseph P. Blitz, Inc. v. Di Cesare & Monaco Building Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962
- Sikkema v. PackardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Geiger Roofing Co. v. ThompsonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.