Legal Opinion

Mechanic's Lien Filed by Supreme Plumbing Co. v. Seadco Building Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 15, 1928PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to cancel and discharge mechanic’s lien denied, with ten dollars costs. The Lien Law does not empower the courts to cancel or discharge mechanics’ liens upon a summary application upon any grounds other than those specified in that law and there is no inherent power in the courts to cancel or discharge a mechanic’s hen. (Matter of Cohen, No. 1, 209 App. Div. 413.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Seudder, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Aaron v. Great Bay Contracting, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Dember Construction Corp. v. P & R Electric Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Lycee Francais v. CalagnaNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Northside Tower Realty, LLC v. Klin Construction Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. In re LoweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API