Legal Opinion

In re Bronitsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by Harry Annish from an order of. the Supreme Cburt, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 27th day of Movember, 1909, canceling a mechanic’s lien. .

1Opinion of the Court

Woodward, J.:

Harry Annisli, a laborer, under the provisions of the Lien Law, filed a notice of lien in the office of the clerk of Kings county .on the 1st day of April, 1909, against one Bn bin, as owner, and against Joseph Bronitsky, as contractor, and affecting certain premises on Van Sicklen Place, borough of Brooklyn. Bronitsky, as contractor, instituted a proceeding for the cancellation of this notice by serving moving papers upon the lienor, the sole ground of such motion being that an ordinary action had been brought against him in the Municipal Court on the day that the lien was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Raleigh & Gaston Railroad v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Dudley v. . MayhewNew York Court of Appeals · 1849

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  2. Geiger Roofing Co. v. ThompsonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1967
  3. In re 12 East Eighty-Sixth Street Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API