Legal Opinion
Creative Living, Inc. v. Steinhauser
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 6, 1974PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtIsrael Rubin, J.
This action has been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts pursuant to CPLR 3222.
Plaintiff retained a real estate broker to negotiate with the defendant for the purchase of premises 621-629 East 163rd Street and 604^612 Teasdale Place, Bronx, N. Y. which premises were owned by the defendant.
A contract of sale was ultimately entered into on May 28, 1970, providing a purchase price of $80,000 and the sum of $8,000 was given to the defendant as a down payment pursuant to the contract. The date for closing was set for October 15, 1970, time being made of the essence.
Prior to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Forster v. . ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Vought v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- New York Investors, Inc. v. Manhattan Beach Bathing Parks Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- New York Investors, Inc. v. Manhattan Beach Bathing Parks Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Haar v. DalyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hudson-Port Ewen Associates, L.P. v. Chien KuoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Aronoff v. Lenkin Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Patten of New York Corp. v. GeoffrionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- United States v. 21.5 AcresDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984