Legal Opinion

New York Investors, Inc. v. Manhattan Beach Bathing Parks Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1931PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

The contract of sale provided that the plaintiff’s title should be approved and insured by the Title Guarantee and Trust Company before the defendant should be obligated to accept the title and pay the purchase price. The record does not disclose an unequivocal approval of the title by the Title Guarantee and Trust Company. The defendant was not, therefore, bound to accept the title tendered.

We have examined the other questions urged by the appellant but deem it unnecessary to express any opinion in regard to them in view of our conclusion that there was not such an approval of the title by…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Laba v. CareyNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Hudson-Port Ewen Associates, L.P. v. Chien KuoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Kopp v. BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  4. Plimpton v. Mattakeunk Cabin Colony, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1934
  5. Gilchrest-Great Neck, Inc. v. ByersNew York Supreme Court · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API