Legal Opinion

Hudson-Port Ewen Associates, L.P. v. Chien Kuo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 7, 1991PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Casey, J.

Following execution of a contract to sell real property located on the Hudson River, a title report revealed that portions of the land were subject to a commerce grant issued by the State and a right of reentry contained in letters patent issued by the State. Although given the opportunity, defendants Chien Kuo and Helen Kuo (hereinafter defendants), the sellers, did not remedy these defects. At the closing, attended by representatives of the parties’ respective title insurance companies, plaintiff (the buyer) refused to tender the balance of the purchase price…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. BROWN BROS. v. Beam Constr.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. WesolowskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Sutton v. East River Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Laba v. CareyNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Wells v. Shearson Lehman/American Express, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Nycal Corp. v. INOCO PLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  2. Hamburg v. American Ref-Fuel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. United States Underwriters Insurance v. Affordable Housing Foundation, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  4. Currier, McCabe & Associates, Inc. v. MaherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. In Re Oyster Bay Cove, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1993

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API