Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Williams

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 14, 1989No. B035346PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROWEN, J. *

Plaintiff and defendant are both lawyers. Plaintiff, Jack Allen Thompson (Thompson), brought the present action to recover a referral fee pursuant to an agreement he had with defendant, Hal W. Williams, Jr. (Williams), individually, and as agent for defendant Pollack Lintz Williams, Inc. (Pollack Lintz Williams), a law corporation. In pretrial discovery, Thompson’s deposition was taken in this case and in another independent, but related, matter. Based upon evidence obtained thereby, defendant Williams moved for summary judgment on the grounds that an accord and satisfaction…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Chern v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Sprecher v. Adamson CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Roth v. RhodesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. City of San Diego v. United States Gypsum Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Soules v. Cadam, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. River Bank America v. DillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. FEI Enterprises Inc. v. YoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API