Esty v. Cummings
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action of ejectment in the district court for St. Louis county. Tbe case was tried before Ensign, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Action in ejectment. A former appeal is reported'in 75 Minn. 549, 78 N. W. 242. The plaintiff had a verdict in the court below, and defendant appeals from an order denying a new trial. The short facts are as follows :
In August, 1894, Alexander D. Cummings, the husband of defendant, was the owner of the premises in question. They were then incumbered by three valid mortgages, aggregating, without interest, $7,900. The first and second of these mortgages had been foreclosed, and the time of redemption was about to expire. One Neis Hall owned the third mortgage, but neither Cummings nor Hall had…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sandwich Mfg. Co. v. ZellmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Dobbin v. CordinerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Alexander v. EllisonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880
- Esty v. CummingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Minton v. New York Elevated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. StagebergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Finnegan v. SunTrust MortgageDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- Minneapolis Builders Supply Co. v. Calhoun Beach Club Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Olson v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938